Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Chris McCandless: A dynamic hero


      Chris McCandless: A dynamic hero

            In Webster’s dictionary the definition of Hero is “A man admired for his achievements and noble qualities. One who shows great courage.” Chris McCandless’s story has been causing controversy for years. There are supporters of McCandless and then there are critics. After reading and thinking about what he did people create their own unique opinions of him.  My own opinion of McCandless is that he was a hero with flaws. Mental strength, physical strength and intelligence are the three reasons that he should be called a hero. 
            The first reason I think Chris is a hero is the mental strength he had. Mental strength is can effect a person’s look on life. He had the strength to follow a dream of his, even when others thought it was crazy. The courage he had to go beyond society and look for the deeper meaning of life is incredible. “If he started a job, he’d finish it. It was almost like a moral thing for him. He was what you call extremely ethical. He set pretty high standards for himself.” (Krakauer, 18) That quote was said from Wayne Westerberg about Chris. Another quote from Chris’s father, Walt McCandless, “Chris was good at almost everything he ever tried,” (118) basically says that Chris was super confident in himself which is a form of mental strength. His flaws when it came to mental strength were the fact that he was over confident in his ability to go to Alaska. He just thought that he could just walk into Alaska and keep his sanity. Chris died of starvation. Starvation is known to play with your mind; you slowly lose your sanity.  Another one of Chris’s flaws was that he believed he could be out there and happy by himself. He soon found out that was not that case. He wrote in his journal, “Happiness is only real, when shared.” That phrase was one of the last things he wrote and to me, is an important lesson he learned from his life.  
            The second reason I think he is a hero is his physical strength. He hitchhiked great distances and trained every morning while he was at “the slabs”. “He did calisthenics each morning to get in shape for the rigors of the bush and discussed backcountry survival strategies at length with Bob, self-styled survivalist.”(45) The fact that he put time and effort into working out was very smart of him, even though he wasn’t the biggest guy. “Five feet seven or eight with a wiry build,” is what Jim Gallien, the last person to see him alive, described him as. The flaws that Chris made when it came to his physical strength were that his body weakened from the lack of nutrition going into his body. He lost a drastic amount of weight toward the end of his life. He also did not pack that well. Chris needed better clothing and food. “He wasn’t carrying anywhere near as much food and gear as you’d expect a guy to be carrying for that kind of trip”. (4)
            The last reason I think he is a hero is his intelligence. Chris was not a high school dropout. He went to Emory University a well-established school in Atlanta, Georgia. Chris had the intelligence that impressed many of the people he met on his travels. He wrote in his journal and took advice from survivalists. While in the bus, he read books to keep his mind sharp.  “You could tell right away that Alex was intelligent.” (18) Wayne Westerberg said that quote about Alex Supertramp (aka Chris). “In May 1990, Chris graduated from Emory University in Atlanta, where he’d been a columnist for; and editor of, the student newspaper, The Emory Wheel, and had distinguished himself as a history and anthropology major with a 3.72 grade-point average.” (20) The flaws that he had when it came to intelligence are he didn’t have the common sense to realize he needed to prepare himself for this trip. He did try but he should have read more and bought more supplies.

                        Critics of McCandless believe he was a complete fool that should not be having this much publicity. Nick Jans, a writer and teacher, wrote into Krakauer in respond to his original article. “McCandless was hardly unique; there’s quite a few of these guys hanging around the state, so much alike that they’re almost a collective cliché. The only difference is that McCandless ended up dead, with the story of his dumbassedness splashed across the media…” (71). I think that these critics are very wrong. My biggest opinion on the critics of McCandless is that they judge someone’s life they didn’t even know. Yes, the people who praise McCandless, didn’t know him either. Chris chose to live his life the way he did.

                        In conclusion, I believe Chris McCandless was a hero with flaws. I do look up to him in different ways. How can you not? He had the courage to be different and chaise his dreams. His mental strength, physical strength and intelligence are what make him a hero with flaws. What human doesn’t have flaws? But to say he was stupid and foolish for pushing his confort zone and inspiring almost all the people he met is idiotic. I want you, the reader to take what you have learned and think about your life. Do you have a dream that you want to become a reality? Do you want to be pushed out of your comfort zone? Do you want to see the beauty that is life? Take what you have learned and apply it to your life. See the beauty and make a change because you only have one life.

                                                            Work Cited
            "HeroAbout Our Definitions: All Forms of a Word (noun, Verb, Etc.) Are Now Displayed on One Page." Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 25 Mar. 2013.

No comments:

Post a Comment